I'm carefree, but I'm calculated
I'm friendly, but I'm aloof
I'm lazy, but I'm hardworking
I'm trustworthy, but I'm secretive
I'm open minded, but I have boundaries
I'm wise, But I'm foolish
I'm lucid, but I'm irrational
I love company, but I love being alone
I'm warm, but I'm cold
Should I blame people if they think I'm a two-faced bitch?
Tuesday, January 13, 2009
Thursday, January 1, 2009
New Year Reflection
2008 came and went, yet it's all a blur to me. I can barely separate 2008 into moments. How can i when it seems to have been just one short, fleeting moment.
Where are the big plans i made, all the grand goals i would accomplish by the end of the year?
Another year wasted procrastinating, second guessing, loafing, doing nothing...I was going to discover my purpose, my strengths and my true love (whatever that thing or person is)...the world was going to discover me, i was going to make strides, people were going to start feeling my presence, my worth.
How many opportunities have been lost procrastinating?
Well, 2008 was a great vacation. I spent it with friends who've been there for me for years and that for me was the highlight.
Now on to 2009, and i'm declaring it a year of action. Hold me to it! This year it's going to be different...I won't spend January 1, 2010 writing another reflection on the year i don't remember...in fact i won't have to write a reflection--- because you will remember it.
Where are the big plans i made, all the grand goals i would accomplish by the end of the year?
Another year wasted procrastinating, second guessing, loafing, doing nothing...I was going to discover my purpose, my strengths and my true love (whatever that thing or person is)...the world was going to discover me, i was going to make strides, people were going to start feeling my presence, my worth.
How many opportunities have been lost procrastinating?
Well, 2008 was a great vacation. I spent it with friends who've been there for me for years and that for me was the highlight.
Now on to 2009, and i'm declaring it a year of action. Hold me to it! This year it's going to be different...I won't spend January 1, 2010 writing another reflection on the year i don't remember...in fact i won't have to write a reflection--- because you will remember it.
No sex...but you let him eat it
There are many girls who are doing their best to preserve their virtue, saving that virginity for the honeymoon with Mr Right. Others might not be virgins but aren't in a committed relationship and, therefore, are choosy about who they go to bed with. They would rather have no sex than wake up regretting the deed.
What's a girl to do when the urges are strong and there are so many men ready to satisfy them. Let him eat it of course! after all it is not sex....or is it?
You might not want to have sex for whatever reason, maybe as mentioned above you are saving youself for someone special, or you might just not want to give in too early in the relationship and have him lose respect for you. So why are there so many girls who are refusing to have intercourse with a guy, but feel no way about letting him perform oral sex on them?
Oral sex is sex, isn't it? Isn't that why they have the word 'sex' follow 'oral'? Is the girl who saves it for her wedding night but has had oral sex performed on her still virtuous? Will giving a man oral sex instead of intercourse preserve your virtue? Will he think you have self restraint because you didn't let him 'hit it'?
I've heard a man liken the vagina to heaven. According to him, it doesn't matter to a man whether you had intercourse with him or you allowed him to eat it. He says once the man has been given any access to that 'heaven', he will count it. According to him, if you have oral sex, you may as well have sex. If he would have lost respect for you because you were too easy to bed, he will still lose respect for you for allowing him to perfom oral sex on you. The theory is that you have already allowed him access to that most sacred of places....your 'heaven'
So are you really preserving your virtue by not letting him go all the way? Will he see it as self restraint? Will he understand that you only did it to please him?
You see many girls justify allowing oral sex but not intercourse by saying he was pressuring her and she thought that was the best compromise. You don't want to lose your virtue by having intercourse, but you don't want him to lose interest and move on because you were playing hard to bed.
But will he really be satisfied with just giving you oral sex? Won't he think that he's got his foot inside the door, on step closer to being inside that heaven? You see, most guys are depending on the sexual feelings to overwhelm you, sweep you up, build until you start begging for him to enter you, to fill that most sacred of places. He thinks it's just a matter of progression, that you are just playing hard to get because you really want to do it. He just needs to hit the right buttons to speed it up and assure you you're doing nothing wrong. You're just doing what every girl does and your nos are really "yes, please! don't listen to me. I just have to do this but please, please, #@*& me!"
So, no sex...but you let him eat it?
What's a girl to do when the urges are strong and there are so many men ready to satisfy them. Let him eat it of course! after all it is not sex....or is it?
You might not want to have sex for whatever reason, maybe as mentioned above you are saving youself for someone special, or you might just not want to give in too early in the relationship and have him lose respect for you. So why are there so many girls who are refusing to have intercourse with a guy, but feel no way about letting him perform oral sex on them?
Oral sex is sex, isn't it? Isn't that why they have the word 'sex' follow 'oral'? Is the girl who saves it for her wedding night but has had oral sex performed on her still virtuous? Will giving a man oral sex instead of intercourse preserve your virtue? Will he think you have self restraint because you didn't let him 'hit it'?
I've heard a man liken the vagina to heaven. According to him, it doesn't matter to a man whether you had intercourse with him or you allowed him to eat it. He says once the man has been given any access to that 'heaven', he will count it. According to him, if you have oral sex, you may as well have sex. If he would have lost respect for you because you were too easy to bed, he will still lose respect for you for allowing him to perfom oral sex on you. The theory is that you have already allowed him access to that most sacred of places....your 'heaven'
So are you really preserving your virtue by not letting him go all the way? Will he see it as self restraint? Will he understand that you only did it to please him?
You see many girls justify allowing oral sex but not intercourse by saying he was pressuring her and she thought that was the best compromise. You don't want to lose your virtue by having intercourse, but you don't want him to lose interest and move on because you were playing hard to bed.
But will he really be satisfied with just giving you oral sex? Won't he think that he's got his foot inside the door, on step closer to being inside that heaven? You see, most guys are depending on the sexual feelings to overwhelm you, sweep you up, build until you start begging for him to enter you, to fill that most sacred of places. He thinks it's just a matter of progression, that you are just playing hard to get because you really want to do it. He just needs to hit the right buttons to speed it up and assure you you're doing nothing wrong. You're just doing what every girl does and your nos are really "yes, please! don't listen to me. I just have to do this but please, please, #@*& me!"
So, no sex...but you let him eat it?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
